|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
Ford's Mark Fields: Lineup changes will "meet or beat" competitors' fuel economyJuly 23, 2008 / By Andrew Strieber /
Article provided by: Truck Trend Magazine
The average price of gas has dropped a little recently -- currently at $4.04 -- but of course this has done little to stop Americans' waning interest in gas guzzlers. June's decline in new vehicle sales has carried over to this month, with pickups and large SUVs continuing to languish on dealer lots. Commuters are hurting, and now Ford's president of the Americas Mark Fields says that Dearborn hears them, claiming that with new technology the automaker will soon "meet or beat the competition in fuel economy." Overall new car sales in the U.S. fell by 18 percent in June, and the first half of 2008 has been the worst period for the industry in 15 years. Ford in particular has seen sales off 14 percent since the beginning of 2008, and the company understands that gas consumption is at the heart of the problem. Speaking at the Model T Centennial Celebration in Wayne County, Indiana, Fields outlined several vehicles and powertrain developments that will help improve mpg ratings across the automaker's lineup. Starting with new Fusion and Mercury Milan hybrid sedans due out by the end of 2008, according to Fields the coming year will also see the introduction of Ford's new Ecoboost technology, which combines turbocharging and direct injection to help smaller engines offer the performance of a large-displacement mill, but with better fuel economy. A twin-turbo, Ecoboost 3.5-liter V-6 will debut in the new Lincoln MKS in the spring of 2009, then drop in the Flex a month later. In the next year and a half the technology will also make its way to the new F-150, and Dearborn hopes to eventually offer it in 23 different nameplates by 2012.  Mark Fields speaking at the Model T Centennial Celebration Repeating his company's claim that its quality is on par with Honda and Toyota, Fields also said that Ford plans to replace 100 percent of its product lineup by 2010, and down the line will stress weight reduction as a way to make cars more efficient. According to reports the automaker will bring up to six models stateside from Europe, re-tooling several American truck plants in order to build them. In addition contrary to recent rumors that the brand would be axed, Mercury will play a large part in this new strategy, which is set to be outlined on Thursday. In the meantime Ford has continued its cost-cutting measures, announcing a new round of buyouts earlier this week and delaying the addition of a third shift at its Oakville, Ontario plant which builds the Edge, Flex, and Lincoln MKX CUVs. Unless gas prices drop unexpectedly over the coming months, most would agree that the automaker's new technologies and smaller, Euro-based vehicles can't reach American showrooms fast enough. Source: The Detroit Free Press and Ford
|
Ford Escape E85 Blend Ethanol With Hybrid Technology
WASHINGTON , D.C., June 13 - After months of rigorous testing, Ford Motor Company's demonstration fleet of...
06/14/2007 | 15:06 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Escape Hybrid: For the Environmentalist In You
How would you like to drive an SUV and not have to defend yourself with your environmental friendly friends?...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Escape: Buzzing with Details
DEARBORN, Mich., Jan. 26, 2007 – The new 2008 Ford Escape is entering the marketplace with a bold new design, a...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Ford Escape Hybrid: All Of The Advantages At A Great Price
DEARBORN, Mich., March 19, 2007 - In 2004, Ford Motor Company introduced the world’s first hybrid from an American...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Escape: Refined Ruggedness enters the LA Auto Show
At the second 2006 Los Angeles Auto Show, Ford Motor Co. rolled out the 2008 Escape and Escape hybrid SUV....
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
|
| |