|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
2009 Subaru Forester named IIHS Top Safety PickApril 17, 2008 / By Rory Jurnecka /
Article provided by: Truck Trend Magazine
If you're in the market for a safe car, you could do a lot worse than the 2009 Subaru Forester, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The redesigned Forester has been recognized by the IIHS as a Top Safety Pick by earning the highest crash safety rating in front, side, and rear impact tests, as well as featuring an electric stability control system - all requirements for qualification. Frontal crash testing procedures call for a 40 mph offset collision after which measurements dictate how much driver injury is likely to occur and how much intrusion there is in the cabin. In side crash testing, a barrier based on the front end of an SUV contacts the vehicle's side at 31 mph and injuries are assessed on two crash test dummies. Finally, rear crash testing tests the effectiveness of the head restraints by monitoring dummy neck movement during a 20 mph rear end collision. Thus far, the IIHS has designated 37 vehicles currently sold in the U.S. as Top Safety Picks. Source: PR Newswire
|
2009 Subaru Forester tested Safe from All Crashes
CHERRY HILL, N.J., May 21, 2008 — Subaru of America, Inc. today announced that the 2009 Subaru Forester earned the...
06/03/2008 | 22:06 PM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester is, again, Top Safety Pick
Cherry Hill, N.J., April 17, 2008 — The all-new 2009 Subaru Forester has earned the Insurance Institute for Highway...
04/23/2008 | 05:04 AM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester All-Mature at Detroit Auto Show
DETROIT -- Subaru of America, Inc. today introduced the all-new, third-generation 2009 Forester. A total re-design of...
01/16/2008 | 15:01 PM
|
|
2008 Subaru Forester, Legacy, Outback Are EPA SmartWay Picks
CHERRY HILL, N.J., August 16, 2007 -- Subaru of America, Inc. today announced that its 2008 PZEV (Partial Zero Emission...
08/16/2007 | 14:08 PM
|
|
Redesigned 2009 Subaru Forester priced lower than 2008 model
Want something sporty but functional? Oh, and less expensive than its last year model (but packed with even more...
03/02/2008 | 18:03 PM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester Photo Gallery
A quick look at the first official U.S. spec photos of the 2009 Subaru Forester shows a vehicle that has grown up on multiple fronts and definitely looks more the part of crossover.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Subaru Forester
Where is eight bigger than twenty? Under the hood of the 2006 Subaru Forester, it seems, were a new naturally aspirated engine results in a whole new car.
more
|
|
|
|
| |