|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
2008 SUOTY Contender Road Test: 2008 Toyota Highlander
No Miss Congeniality
By Frank Markus
It's easy to imagine the Highlander as a student who's been cramming for this exam for years, its guidance counselors scrutinizing our Sport/Utility of the Year criteria to find any opportunity for improving their scores. And improve them it did. On superiority, the upgrades to an already solid vehicle are all laudable: more passenger and cargo space, myriad new features easily controlled via a user-friendly knob-centric dash, and a new standard 3.5-liter V-6 delivering 270 strong horses that can tow up to 5000 pounds. Hybrids get standard all-wheel drive and new economy-boosting features. In the significance category, Toyota's marketing efforts have helped make the Highlander a segment sales leader. With models ranging from front-drivers with cloth seating for five, to leather-lined Limited seven-seat Hybrids, Toyota caters to a wide slice of the SUV-buying (and tree-hugging) public, earning big points in this category. In terms of value, the much improved Highlander starts at just $27,245, or $620 more than last year's entry V-6 model ($1680 up on the unlamented four-banger). Top Limited Hybrid models tiptoe over the $40K mark. It's not cheap, but Toyota's sterling reputation for quality, reliability, and resale delivers strong bang for the buck. And yet, like a brown-nosing teacher's pet, the Highlander failed. Drop the hammer, and the engine moans and sounds like it's complaining. Bend it into a curve, and the tires howl in protest. Despite the "Sport" badging on its flanks, it's no jock. | 2008 Toyota Highlander | | Base price range | $27,245-$40,635 | | Price as tested | $40,953 (Sport AWD) | | Vehicle layout | Front engine, AWD, 7-pass, 4-door SUV | | Engine | 3.5L/270-hp/249-lb-ft DOHC 24-valve V-6 | | Transmission | 6-speed automatic | | Curb weight (f/r dist) | 4489 lb (55/45%) | | Wheelbase | 109.8 in | | Length x width x height | 188.4 x 75.2 x 69.3 in | | 0-60 mph | 7.3 sec | | Quarter mile | 15.7 sec @ 87.7 mph | | Braking, 60-0 mph | 123 ft | | Lateral acceleration | 0.74 g (avg) | | MT Figure Eight | 28.6 sec @ 0.58 g (avg) | | EPA city/hwy fuel econ | 17/23 mpg | | CO2 emissions | 1.01 lb/mile | | Ratings | | Engineering | ***** | | Design | ****1/2 | | Interior/Functionality | **** | | Performance | ****1/2 | | On-Road Refinement | **** | | Off-Road Ability | *** | | Value | ***** | | Bottom Line | A spectacularly competent vehicle that needs to stop acting like a minivan and let its hair down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Toyota Highlander
My husband and I are considering buying an 02 Highlander. We want the flexibility of the storage capacity, as well as...
09/09/2007 | 02:09 AM | picots
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Toyota Highlander
When it arrived in 2001, the first-generation Toyota Highlander was at the forefront of the trend toward crossovers and away fro
more
|
|
|
|
|
|