|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
First Drive: 2003 Land Rover Freelander SE3
Adequate, if not stirring
Photography by David Newhardt, the author
The three-door Freelander SE3, which has been available in Europe since 1997, is coming to America for '03 to join the smallish sport/utility marketplace. Mechanically identical to the five-door Freelander, including its 101-inch wheelbase, the three-door has a 2.5-liter/174-horsepower DOHC V-6 and a five-speed automatic transmission feeding power through full-time all-wheel drive. The SE3 gets a full suite of standard electronic aids, including Electronic Traction Control, Electronic Brakeforce Distribution, and Hill Descent Control. The SE3's solidly adequate, if not stirring, performance mimics that of its five-door sibling--and weighs the same, at 3577-pounds.
What sets it apart from its competitors? The detachable rear hardback. Releasing four latches frees the 60-pound top. Options include a folding soft-top and a tonneau cover. True to Land Rover heritage is the SE3's ability to clamber over obstacles. The SE3 has no low range, but its traction control works with an AWD system employing a center viscous coupling unit that directs power to the wheels with the most grip, letting the fully independent suspension scrabble past terrain you wouldn't normally walk through. Inside, the SE3 is typical Land Rover: a mix of quality materials and quixotic control placement. Shoulder room is limited, but the removable sunroof panels give tall drivers relief. The standard harman/kardon sound system is top-shelf. Land Rover plans on importing just 2200 SE3s in the U.S. for '03, but the Freelander will get a midlife freshening for '04. This is a true Land Rover, idiosyncrasies and all. | 2003 Land Rover Freelander SE3 | | Price | $26,995 | | Vehicle layout | Front engine, awd, 3-door, 5-pass | | Engine | 2.5L/174-hp V-6, DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | | 0-60 mph, sec | 10.5 (est) | | On sale in U.S. | Currently |
|
|
What women want
The best-selling cars by gender Women prefer safety, affordability; men like power, luxury We knew something wasn't...
06/29/2005 | 04:06 AM
|
|
|
Top 10 Cars
cmr/BMWDude wrote: Not only that Boycey, I've heard countless warnings from Range Rover owners that say the vehicles...
05/28/2005 | 01:05 AM
|
|
|
Shots of the 2007 Land Rover LR2
Pretty. (And no, I'm not talking about the model who's actually blocking the SUV!)...
06/26/2006 | 15:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|