|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
Long-Term Update: 2005 BMW X3 2.5i
Once, twice, three times a lady
By Neil G. Chirico
Photography by Brian Vance
With the continuing popularity of SUVs--even with current fuel prices--it's surprising that BMW has managed for so long with the X5 as its sole representative in this lucrative and profitable segment. The next logical step, then, was to morph a compact sport/utility off its best-selling 3 Series, thus creating the X3 last year. Based on the new 3 Series architecture just hitting our shores, it deserves a year-long look. Typical of the BMW ordering system, many options are available a la carte: To the base price of $30,300, we managed to add another $13,950 in options, for a total of $44,945 including the $695 destination charge. Our 2.5-liter-equipped X3 came draped in Flamenco Red Metallic paint, a dark Burgundy hue that added $475 to the bottom line. We matched it with black leather seating ($1450). Also on the list: $3700 for the Premium Package, $1500 for the Sport Package, $1275 for the Steptronic automatic transmission, $1800 for the NAV system, $800 for Xenon headlights, and the $750 Cold Weather Package (not exactly an L.A. necessity, but popular for lots of other markets). Given all the rain in Los Angeles this past winter, we were surprised to see logbook commentary about the wiper blades needing to be replaced; curious, since the first comment showed up at the 1223-mile mark.   | One-Month Update: BMW X3 2.5i | | Base price | $30,995 | | Price as tested | $44,945 | | Vehicle layout | Front engine, AWD, 4-door, 5-pass, SUV | | Engine | 2.5L/184 hp/175 lb-ft 24-valve I-6 | | Transmission | 5-speed automatic | | Curb weight | 4103 lb | | Wheelbase | 110.1 in | | Length x Width x Height | 179.7 x 73.0 x 66.0 in | | 0-60 mph | 9.8 sec | | Quarter-mile | 17.2 sec @ 80.0 mph | | Braking, 60-0 mph | 130 ft | | Lateral acceleration | 0.84 g avg | | MT Figure-Eight | 28.1 sec @ 0.57 g avg | | EPA city/hwy econ | 17/23 mpg | | Total mileage | 2201 | | Average test mpg | 15.0 | | Problem areas | Wiper blades | From The Logbook "The X3 has become just as cool to be seen in as an X5." -- Brian Vance |
|
|
X3 & X5: Did BMW sell out?
I don't think it will diminish their reputation but it saddens me to see automakers like BMW, Porsche and even Benz...
11/01/2006 | 11:11 AM | joela
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z8 to arrive in 2010?
"We're thinking about it," is BMW R&D chief Burkhard Goschel's laconic answer every time someone mentions a replacement...
06/19/2006 | 03:06 AM | joela
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 BMW X3
When the BMW X3 debuted back in early 2004, it seemed to be an anachronism: an upscale, premium-branded, premium-priced, small s
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|