|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Truck Trend Magazine
Nissan drops 2009 Murano MSRP $1,500 in face of new competitionJanuary 17, 2008 / By Zach Gale /
Article provided by: Truck Trend Magazine
Nissan is releasing the 2009 Murano into a market that has become overstuffed with crossover choices since the first-generation model debuted in 2003. Not looking to get creamed by the crossover competition, Nissan has smartly dropped the base price on all carryover trim levels by $1,500 -- an amount equaled by the current incentive offered on the 2007 model. A 2009 Murano S FWD will start at $26,330 and an SL FWD at $27,880 compared to the 2007 model's $27,830 and $29,380, respectively. All prices, including the $35,910 for the new top-of-the-line LE AWD model, do not include the $745 destination and handling charge. Pushing a "mobile suite" theme for its interior, Nissan is offering a dual panel moonroof, 11-speaker Bose audio system, and the 9.3 GB Music Box hard drive/touch screen navigation system combination finding its way onto an increasing number of Nissan and Infiniti models. Curiously, iPod connectivity is standard only on the LE model. Will a lower price, gently evolved styling, and a nudge to 265 horsepower be enough to sustain sales in the face of so many new competitors? We think so.
|
2009 Nissan Murano $540 Increase
Nissan today announced interim pricing adjustments on the 2008 Nissan Sentra and 2009 Nissan Murano, effective...
07/09/2008 | 04:07 AM
|
|
2009 Nissan Murano's $1500 drop from 2008 Model
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (Jan. 15, 2007) - Nissan North America, Inc. today announced pricing on the all-new, totally...
01/16/2008 | 15:01 PM
|
|
Nissan prices 2007 SUVs, new Versa
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) announced this week the 2007 model year pricing for Frontier...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2009 Nissan Minivans, Pickups, SUVs, and Trucks More Featur
Nissan Motor Co. recently released information on its crossover, minivans, SUVs, and pickup trucks....
08/04/2008 | 00:08 AM
|
|
2008 Nissan Rogue: Out of the Shadows
Remember the elusive Rogue which we reported last year? Well, Nissan snuck out some surprisingly extensive details...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Nissan Murano
Will big teeth and big feet equal big sales? Nissan redesigns its Murano crossover for 2009.
more
|
|
2004 SUV of the Year Testing
Nothing is evolving faster than the sport/utility vehicle segment. Defining "sport/utility" is like trying to hit several fast-moving targets. Just try comparing them all
more
|
|
|
|
| |